Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 20 Next »

How to Join

 Click here to expand...

 

By Browser

By telephone

  • US telephone number: +1 201.479.2627

 

Agenda

 

  • Quickly review previous meeting minutes (5 min)
    • Release Process
    • Testing/Countinous Delivery
  • After-action review & next week's agenda (5 min)

Minutes

Developers Forum 2013-01-16
Recording:
Attendees
  • Lauren Stanisic
  • Michael Downey
  • Roger Friedman
  • Burke Mamlin
  • Jeremy Keiper
  • Ryan Yates
  • Daniel Kayiwa
  • Mhawila Mhawila
  • Elliott Williams
  • Rafal Korytkowski
  • Wyclif Luyima
  • Paul Biondich
  • Chris Power
  • Darius Jazayeri
  • Suranga K
  • Nyoman Ribeka
  • Steve Githens
Agenda & Minutes
  • Review Last Week's TODOs
  • TODO: Need some clear boundaries/goals/stakes in the Order Entry Sprint ground/timelines
  • Reschedule topics: Road Map & Implementers Wist List (with Chris Power available)
  • TODO: Is there way to run SonarQube against pull requests (a la Travis CI) rather than commits?
  • TODO: Create a JIRA issue related to dbunit.dataset.NoSuchTableException errors from Bamboo/SonarQube (Darius)
  • Order Entry Sprint Showcase (Wyclif & Burke) 
  • Release Process
  • ?
  • Testing/Continous Delivery
  • QA Recommendations for 2013 were:
  • Emphasize the importance of automated testing at all levels (unit, service, integration, performance). Create a robust testing pyramid
  • Concern that current testing approach is somewhat cumbersome and focused on component/data interactions
  • Include acceptance criteria review/creation in JIRA curation activities; acceptance criteria and test case scenarios should be mandatory
  • Explore ways to formalize the core<-->module contract using Integration Contract Tests.
  • Publish/Subscribe contract tests in component pipelines
  • Execute module tests against all supported versions of core; publish test results for community consumption
  • Adopt a scenario based testing approach to capture high-value paths through the system [especially from implementations]
  • Consider adopting BDD testing tooling; leverage community expertise to increase scenario coverage?
  • QA Recommendations for 2014 were:
  • Manage cycle times to keep feedback loops optimized
  • <5m from commit for unit & component tests
  • <60m from commit for service & integration tests
  • Addition of additional deployment targets & test clients may be necessary [parallel execution]
  • Consider automatic inclusion of community modules in pipeline
  • Goals for CI/CD
  • (stated 2013 CD goals were improvements in Configuration Management, Quality Assurance, and Environments & Deployments)
  • A clear list of community-supported modules and some clearly defined criteria for why modules are or are not in the list
  • Is it just what's in the reference application?
  • TODO: define this process and vet with community (Burke/Darius) along with what gets tested
  • What are the intended targets for CD/CI?
  • Scope: Reference application (API + platform + refapp modules + community supported modules included in OpenMRS 2.0+)
  • What are community supported modules? 
  • Improving the development process (quicker feedback to devs)
  • Improving the code (reducing defects, increasing quality & reliability)
  • More automation (always increasing amount of automation)
  • Making "nightly" (current) builds available
  • OpenMRS API jar
  • OpenMRS WAR
  • Each community modules
  • NOT currently omod snapshots (other than what is included in WAR)
  • Deployments included in CI process
  • Standalone
  • Small system
  • Large system
  • Current issues with CI (action plan)
  • How do we test modules?
  • "Deployments" as part of CI
  • What are we "delivering"?
  • We are deploying to test servers (for automated and manual testing)
  • Formal releases
  • BDD
  • Scripted browser testing
  • web driver
  • selenium
  • Governance (what is included)?
  • Making the decisions/process clear to everybody
  • CI Recommendations for 2013:
  • Migrate from CI and individual builds to a CD Pipeline of component and release pipelines
  • Component pipelines for core and individual modules
  • Release pipeline for integration of core and modules
  • Leverage Bamboo automatic plan branching for pipelines
  • Solidify CI practices and incentivize teams to fix broken builds quickly
  • Recognize CI and the Pipeline as a production system for releasing software
  • CI Recommendations for 2014:
  • Incrementally add new validations to the pipeline; fail the build for anything that matters
  • Release modules into OpenMRS module repository upon successful pipeline run
  • After Action Review
  • What did you expect to happen?
  • What actually happened?
  • What can we do differently?

 

Transcripts

  • Backchannel IRC transcript
  • Audio recording of the call: Listen online or download - available after the meeting
  • No labels