3 Steps to Review our Collaboration Status:
- qMonth: Review what's already going on in the OpenMRS community roadmap here
- qWeek: (~ Weekly) Review Collaboration Roadmap
- qWeek: Review ohri tickets in Jira
Other Assets:
- * New * OHRI Packages Content Inventory https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eUcR_ygvL0Pxt26Q7iSwa9XJceVHWNihY-VXw0o2ij8/edit#gid=0
- UI Review: A side by side comparison of 3.x Demo vs OHRI Demo Sept 2021
- Shared Assets Doc: Explains Shared Assets vs Package-Specific Assets, and breaks down OHRI examples.
- Architect Role Descriptions: OpenMRS recognizes the need for the roles spelled out in this document. Shared Assets require a pretty high-skilled developer, architect level person, to design them before a mid-level dev can work on them. Mid-to-junior devs need this kind of support in order to successfully work on shared assets. OpenMRS has some dev/5’s like this but not enough. The roles described in this document aim to address that gap.
- Analytics Team needs: A detailed proposal for what team resources would be needed to thoughtfully address OpenMRS reporting challenges at scale.
- OHRI Wiki Roadmap
Questions for This Week
- PM Check-ins
- Updates/To-do check ins
- Extension slot added? https://github.com/openmrs/openmrs-esm-patient-chart/pull/428
- Need: OCL: Concept Support in Iniz (Support for Concept Name, Synonyms)
- TODO: Grace f/u with team working on this
- Cohort Module Next Steps
- Next steps for Dispensing
- Meet Tuesday? Mwariri to confirm design plan with Paul to get started next week.
- Packaging reports
- Concept Codes across distros (map concepts across different distros semantically)
- FHIR Module ticket - endpoint for encounters
- Updates/To-do check ins
- Sri & Fitti
- OHRI Package things: OMRS not expecting to maintain (Shared Assets yes, OHRI package-specific widgets no.)
- OHRI as library/package/toolkit vs as distribution → Suite of tools available to various sites
- Move to lighterweight set; easier to merge / use things that will compliment implementers' distribution. Ability to pick and choose → microfrontends. Plan to split up - starting with form engine (Otherwise people have to take whole thing). May run into dependencies.
- "Programmatic side" - who is responsible for what? e.g. PATH for implementation - what does that mean for validating work thus far?
Collaboration RoadmapColor Legend: PIH AMPATH UCSF OPENMRS INC BE = Backend FE = Frontend | |||
Done/Resolved | Now What We're Working on Today | Next Next Priorities* | |
Programmatic | Concept Validation with Sites UCSF HIV HTS & C&T Prototype Validation with Sites UCSF COVID Prototype Validation with Sites UCSF | ||
Technical | UI Review: 3.x Demo vs OHRI Demo Comparison of existing 3.x Demo/Community Assets vs OHRI Demo OMRS INC | OHRI Demo Bug Clean Up UCSF Service Delivery Queues Requirements: UCSF Dev: UCSF Core Dependencies: Cohort Module (BE), Patient List Functionality (FE) COVID Dashboard UCSF Core Dependencies: Cohort Module COVID Package widgets UCSF
| (IDEA TO DISCUSS) Prep to microfrontend UCSF-OHRI Repo to be created into a lerna monorepo Eudson lead review to i.d. any dependencies? R/v with Narupa, JJ, others? What core needs are missing that are needed in Community Code / Shared Assets? BLOCKER Embedding Pt Chart Features into Forms BLOCKER Unclear who will lead design (Problem: Current silo between Form-Entered vs Widget-Entered Allergies, Drug Orders, Conditions, Appointments, Immunizations) Leverage existing squad work Test Results Drug Orders Service Summary & Enrollment Vital Signs ...and more Database Flattening |
#ohri Jira Tickets List