User Stories
- As a developer for an existing set of OpenMRS implementations with legacy concepts already being used in the field, I want to start using OCL & the Dictionary Manager ASAP, but I need to be able to use my legacy concepts so that our reports
Workflow
Current Issues & Blockers
Issue: https://github.com/OpenConceptLab/ocl_issues/issues/45
Technical steps for PIH example: Migrating to OCL: PIH Use Case
| CIEL | ocl_omrs Dictionary Conversion Script (converts DB dump into OCL import file) | OCL Bulk Import | OCL TermBrowser | DM WebApp | OCL Subscription Module | OMRS EMR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMRS Nuance | (created b/c Bulk Import doesn't support OMRS SQL - script converts from OMRS model and OMRS DB to OCL model) | Export your existing content (use SQL script here) | |||||
| Sort Weight | Being created in version of OMRS that doesn't have sort weight on concept answers Burke to work with Andy | Sort Weight on Concept Answers is not consistently populated, and frequently does not match the expected value. So either this isn't getting imported correctly into OCL, isn't getting exported correctly from OCL, or isn't getting imported correctly in the subscription module | Add column for CSV format "sort_weight" and apply to correct mapping | Add support for importing sort_weight Error rendering macro 'jira' : Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration. | |||
| Matching Sources | The ocl_omrs script hardcodes the OpenMRS and OCL versions of these names (e.g., "SNOMED CT" in OpenMRS is "SNOMED-CT" in OCL) | The subscription module creates new concept sources if needed, and has no way to match up against existing concept sources if they are named slightly differently. (No validation step.) For whatever reason, in our existing system we have "SNOMED CT" whereas in OCL this is "SNOMED-CT", so these are all getting associated with a different source. Also all of the expected "PIH" mappings are imported as "PIH-temp" mappings, which makes the diffs hard to use to find actual differences. OCL Module should prompt user: "I'm about to create a new source. Is this what you want? Or, pick one to map to/use." | |||||
| 2 Yes Concepts | Where are the 2 yes's coming from? To investigate... | ||||||
| Different Concept Total | PIH experience: Before the import there were 5713 concepts in the dictionary, and afterwards there were 5884 concepts. I will try to dig into this different | ||||||
| Need codes | Respect new map type called "Code": https://talk.openmrs.org/t/building-conventions-for-concept-ids-in-ocl/34809 | Respect new map type called "Code": https://talk.openmrs.org/t/building-conventions-for-concept-ids-in-ocl/34809 |