2007 Implementers Group Meeting Day Five
<html><head><title></title></head><body>_NOTOC_
(day four ←) DAY FIVE: THURSDAY, 26 APRIL 2007
Time |
Title |
Speaker/Event/Topic |
Day Theme: OpenMRS - Funding and Proposals |
---|---|---|---|
07:00 - 09:00 |
Breakfast, small group meetings and discussion |
||
Session: Presentations and Workshop |
Session Chair: Burke Mamlin, Regenstrief Institute |
||
09:00 - 09:15 |
Health Information Systems |
Rosemary Foster |
|
09:15 - 09:45 |
iKhapa |
Andrew Boulle, Russel Eva |
|
09:45 - 10:30 |
Panel Discussion: Developing Capacity through Collaborative Academic Programs and User Networks |
Panelists: Mark Spohr, Ghislain Kouematchoua, Chris Seebregts, Yashik Singh, Hamish Fraser, Christopher Bailey |
|
10:30 - 11:00 |
Tea |
||
Session: Presentations and Workshop |
Session Chair: Chris Seebregts |
||
11:00 - 12:30 |
Refine Proposals and Establish Working Groups |
All |
|
12:30 - 13:00 |
Action Review |
Chris Seebregts |
|
12:45 - 13:00 |
Close |
||
13:00 - 14:00 |
Lunch |
||
14:00 - 17:00 |
Networking on veranda |
Action Review
What was supposed to happen?
- Meet new members of the team
- Bring people together and develop relationships not only between implementers and developers, but also between implementers themselves
- Discuss capacity building
- Learn about new features in OpenMRS
- Give people the confidence in OpenMRS, showing progress to date
- Advance the state of the art
- Meeting as many new people as possible and understanding their needs and desires
- Did not plan to have fun
- Learn about evaluation tools for OpenMRS (document the problems and to document the effects of OpenMRS)
- Learn who was working on what
- Technical meeting early to accommodate the Friday holiday
- Did not expect conversation of policy and capacity building
- Expected to see rapid development tools
- Expected to learn about how to implement OpenMRS
What actually happened
- Met new team members
- Discussed capacity building
- Learned about exciting new features, but they went by quickly
- "The meeting was a big success"
- Did not get a good feel of how OpenMRS is supporting users
- Auto installer was demonstrated
- Developers, Implementers, and Users were able to interact and better understand where things stand
- We saw demonstrations of promising mobile technologies
- Fun was had by all
- We did not cover formal evaluation tools
- We did not hear about feedback from implementation questionnaires
What do we do from here
- Consider having meetings for different needs or change future meetings to meet various needs
- Are we ready for a separate users meeting (policy and user issues)?
- Many spoke of the importance of allowing developers, implementers, users, and policy makers to interact
- Technical day should be preceded by an overview
- Bring OpenMRS team members to non-OpenMRS meetings
- More time for break out sessions and informal discussion
- Would like OpenMRS available on CDs for those without easy network access
- Need to define the road map or blueprint for scaling OpenMRS to meet the needs
- Mobile technology should be high on the agenda
- Aim to show evaluation tools at next year's meeting
- Add evaluation working group
- Update the wiki during the conference like Burke did (best with someone that is not Burke)
- Continue to encourage everyone to participate (except Elaine)
- Next year's meeting
- Select another venue. Rwanda?
- Consider meeting twice a year (once in Rwanda and another time at Paul's house – Paul's paying) — "it doesn't hurt to ask"
- Build on the success of the prior two years considering smaller, more focused meetings (similar to AMIA's Spring Conference)
- Link an OpenMRS meeting to other activities (e.g., HELINA)
- Could encourage OpenMRS folk to meet at other conferences
- e.g., smaller mid-year meeting could be attached to another meeting
- Avoid back-to-back conferences if possible
*Teleconferenced meetings?
- Volunteers to work on this: Hamish, Chris S., Paul
- Take best advantage of our existing electronic technologies — feed the wiki and mailing lists
</body></html>